<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Apple for your thoughts&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Molly, people might be annoyed, but Apple users are loyal ... they can (and will) wait to buy whatever it is.

There's no such thing as *bad* buzz. Buzz is buzz is buzz. It's all good.

And Jay, I'm with you. They do it for the buzz, and it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Molly, people might be annoyed, but Apple users are loyal &#8230; they can (and will) wait to buy whatever it is.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as *bad* buzz. Buzz is buzz is buzz. It&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>And Jay, I&#8217;m with you. They do it for the buzz, and it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Kyle,
I'm not familiar with WebObjects enough to guess how they might work, but just thinking off the cuff I'd say you could;
(1) Stage content at a "nonreferenced" URL out to Akamai - i.e. push it out to the CDN but don't have it linked into the site.

That solves the biggest problem of caching, etc...  right?

For WebObjects, again I'm not sure but it seems like a simple bit of code could show / hide released products.
e.g.
GET * from products where published == 1

Then the store can dynamically show / hide content. Or for that matter you don't even need a new flag.... I'm sure the store shows out of stock items i.e. inventory == 0, but if inventory == -1 then just don't show the entry at all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle,<br />
I&#8217;m not familiar with WebObjects enough to guess how they might work, but just thinking off the cuff I&#8217;d say you could;<br />
(1) Stage content at a &#8220;nonreferenced&#8221; URL out to Akamai - i.e. push it out to the CDN but don&#8217;t have it linked into the site.</p>
<p>That solves the biggest problem of caching, etc&#8230;  right?</p>
<p>For WebObjects, again I&#8217;m not sure but it seems like a simple bit of code could show / hide released products.<br />
e.g.<br />
GET * from products where published == 1</p>
<p>Then the store can dynamically show / hide content. Or for that matter you don&#8217;t even need a new flag&#8230;. I&#8217;m sure the store shows out of stock items i.e. inventory == 0, but if inventory == -1 then just don&#8217;t show the entry at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-710</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the "update" workflow would look like if they wanted to just flip a switch, seeing as they still use WebObjects and most content needs to be seeded to Akamai in advance.

Could they even accomplish it, or does their use of those technologies prevent it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the &#8220;update&#8221; workflow would look like if they wanted to just flip a switch, seeing as they still use WebObjects and most content needs to be seeded to Akamai in advance.</p>
<p>Could they even accomplish it, or does their use of those technologies prevent it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thecapacity.org/2008/02/26/an-apple-for-your-thoughts/#comment-709</guid>
		<description>i can understand the marketing buzz, but i would also argue that taking the store off line "buzzes" in a bad way.  People get ticked off that they can't, for instance, buy a laptop just because a new version of the iPhone is coming out.  I agree that Apple should be able have things go live right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can understand the marketing buzz, but i would also argue that taking the store off line &#8220;buzzes&#8221; in a bad way.  People get ticked off that they can&#8217;t, for instance, buy a laptop just because a new version of the iPhone is coming out.  I agree that Apple should be able have things go live right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
